CGGO vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Capital Group · 104 holdings · $11.5B · as of 2026-05-31
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are CGGO and ONEQ?
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO, by Capital Group) holds 104 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 30 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 21.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 21.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 30CGGO holds 104 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGO 36%·ONEQ 56%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGO
74 of 104 positions (62.3% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGO | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.1% | 53.0% |
| Communication Services | 6.7% | 15.2% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 3.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.3% | 12.5% |
| Financials | 10.4% | 2.8% |
| Other Sectors | 17.2% | 11.3% |
| Unclassified | 3.0% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of CGGO, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | -0.2% | +17.3% | +26.5% | +20.0% | — | — | 0.98% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGO vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(30)
The top 10 shared positions account for 81% of the overlap, led by AVGO, GOOGL and MU.
3.70% | 4.61% | 3.70% | |
3.02% | 4.83% | 3.02% | |
5.69% | 2.37% | 2.37% | |
2.04% | 7.29% | 2.04% | |
1.39% | 11.18% | 1.39% | |
1.37% | 3.01% | 1.37% | |
0.98% | 1.24% | 0.98% | |
0.75% | 9.98% | 0.75% | |
0.74% | 0.92% | 0.74% | |
0.73% | 6.33% | 0.73% | |
0.69% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.55% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.81% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
2.45% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.32% | 0.55% | 0.32% | |
0.53% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.65% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.14% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.38% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.71% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.60% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.78% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.57% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.42% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.71% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGO and ONEQ overlap?
CGGO and ONEQ overlap by 21.2% of portfolio weight. They share 30 holdings (CGGO holds 104 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGO and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 21.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGO and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, GOOGL, MU, MSFT and NVDA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 81% of the total overlap.
What does CGGO own that ONEQ doesn't?
74 positions (62.3% of CGGO) are unique to CGGO, led by TSM, 000660 and 005930. In the other direction, 992 positions (43.4% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.