CGGO vs QQQM: Holdings Overlap
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Capital Group · 104 holdings · $11.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Invesco · 101 holdings · $97.1B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are CGGO and QQQM?
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO, by Capital Group) holds 104 positions; Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 23 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 25.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 25.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 23CGGO holds 104 · QQQM holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGO 31%·QQQM 52%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGO
81 of 104 positions (67.0% of the fund) are not held by QQQM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGO | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.1% | 57.8% |
| Communication Services | 6.7% | 14.2% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 3.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.3% | 11.4% |
| Financials | 10.4% | 0.2% |
| Other Sectors | 17.2% | 12.8% |
| Unclassified | 3.0% | 0.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of CGGO, 0% of QQQM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | -0.2% | +17.3% | +26.5% | +20.0% | — | — | 0.98% |
| QQQM | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.7% | +25.3% | +15.2% | — | 0.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGO vs QQQM →
Shared Holdings(23)
The top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the overlap, led by MU, AVGO and GOOGL.
5.69% | 4.78% | 4.78% | |
3.70% | 3.36% | 3.36% | |
3.02% | 3.51% | 3.02% | |
2.04% | 5.30% | 2.04% | |
1.39% | 8.13% | 1.39% | |
1.37% | 2.96% | 1.37% | |
0.98% | 2.51% | 0.98% | |
0.81% | 0.82% | 0.81% | |
2.45% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
0.75% | 7.26% | 0.75% | |
0.74% | 1.86% | 0.74% | |
0.73% | 4.60% | 0.73% | |
0.69% | 1.01% | 0.69% | |
0.65% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.55% | 0.84% | 0.55% | |
0.53% | 0.64% | 0.53% | |
1.14% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
1.38% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.60% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.71% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.32% | 1.10% | 0.32% | |
0.57% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.42% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGO and QQQM overlap?
CGGO and QQQM overlap by 25.6% of portfolio weight. They share 23 holdings (CGGO holds 104 positions and QQQM holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGO and QQQM?
The two portfolios are 25.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGO and QQQM?
The largest positions held by both funds are MU, AVGO, GOOGL, MSFT and NVDA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the total overlap.
What does CGGO own that QQQM doesn't?
81 positions (67.0% of CGGO) are unique to CGGO, led by TSM, 000660 and 005930. In the other direction, 78 positions (47.4% of QQQM) are unique to QQQM.