CIBR vs FNDC: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
FNDCSchwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Schwab · 1580 holdings · $3.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, FNDC: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and FNDC?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC, by Schwab) holds 1580. They have 2 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 2CIBR holds 42 · FNDC holds 1580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 1%·FNDC 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
40 of 42 positions (98.1% of the fund) are not held by FNDC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| FNDC | +4.3% | +15.1% | +22.5% | +18.2% | +8.5% | +9.0% | 3.53% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs FNDC →
Shared Holdings(2)
 4704Trend Micro Inc/Japan | 1.16% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atos SE EUR1(POST CONSOLIDATION) | 0.20% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and FNDC overlap?
CIBR and FNDC overlap by 0.1% of portfolio weight. They share 2 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and FNDC holds 1580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and FNDC?
The two portfolios are 0.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and FNDC?
The largest positions held by both funds are 4704 and Atos SE EUR1(POST CONSOLIDATION). Together the top 2 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that FNDC doesn't?
40 positions (98.1% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by PANW, CRWD and CSCO. In the other direction, 1578 positions (99.1% of FNDC) are unique to FNDC.