CIBR vs MTUM: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 125 holdings · $26.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, MTUM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and MTUM?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM, by iShares) holds 125. They have 4 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 4CIBR holds 42 · MTUM holds 125
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 13%·MTUM 10%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
38 of 42 positions (86.2% of the fund) are not held by MTUM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MTUM
121 of 125 positions (89.5% of the fund) are not held by CIBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 44.3% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 15.6% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 10.3% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 7.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 6.9% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 15.4% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of MTUM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| MTUM | -1.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% | +29.4% | +12.8% | +16.1% | 0.60% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs MTUM →
Shared Holdings(4)
The top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by AVGO, GOOGL and IBM.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and MTUM overlap?
CIBR and MTUM overlap by 9.2% of portfolio weight. They share 4 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and MTUM holds 125), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and MTUM?
The two portfolios are 9.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and MTUM?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, GOOGL, IBM and ANET. Together the top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that MTUM doesn't?
38 positions (86.2% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by PANW, CRWD and CSCO. In the other direction, 121 positions (89.5% of MTUM) are unique to MTUM.