CQQQ vs EEMV: Holdings Overlap
CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
Invesco · 173 holdings · $3.2B · as of 2026-04-30
EEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 334 holdings · $3.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CQQQ: 2026-04-30, EEMV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CQQQ and EEMV?
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ, by Invesco) holds 173 positions; iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV, by iShares) holds 334. They have 34 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 34CQQQ holds 173 · EEMV holds 334
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CQQQ 21%·EEMV 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CQQQ
139 of 173 positions (78.5% of the fund) are not held by EEMV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in EEMV
300 of 334 positions (94.7% of the fund) are not held by CQQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CQQQ | EEMV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 28.3% | 29.8% |
| Communication Services | 23.3% | 9.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 17.1% | 2.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 15.0% |
| Unclassified | 31.3% | 23.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (31% of CQQQ, 23% of EEMV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | -1.6% | +2.1% | +13.8% | +8.9% | -4.9% | +4.7% | 2.12% |
| EEMV | +1.1% | +16.2% | +20.0% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +5.9% | 2.20% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CQQQ vs EEMV →
Shared Holdings(34)
The top 10 shared positions account for 60% of the overlap, led by 002371, 688041 and 300408.
1.39% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
2.50% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.59% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.53% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.85% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
8.41% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.40% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.25% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.32% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.26% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.25% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.21% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.24% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.24% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.28% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.15% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.20% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.21% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.24% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.12% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.43% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.17% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.75% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.42% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CQQQ and EEMV overlap?
CQQQ and EEMV overlap by 4.5% of portfolio weight. They share 34 holdings (CQQQ holds 173 positions and EEMV holds 334), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CQQQ and EEMV?
The two portfolios are 4.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CQQQ and EEMV?
The largest positions held by both funds are 002371, 688041, 300408, 000725 and 688072. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 60% of the total overlap.
What does CQQQ own that EEMV doesn't?
139 positions (78.5% of CQQQ) are unique to CQQQ, led by 3690, PDD and 9888. In the other direction, 300 positions (94.7% of EEMV) are unique to EEMV.