EEMV vs GDX: Holdings Overlap
EEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 334 holdings · $3.5B · as of 2026-05-31
VanEck · 51 holdings · $23.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EEMV: 2026-05-31, GDX: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EEMV and GDX?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV, by iShares) holds 334 positions; VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX, by VanEck) holds 51. They have 4 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 4EEMV holds 334 · GDX holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EEMV 1%·GDX 9%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EEMV
330 of 334 positions (98.6% of the fund) are not held by GDX. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EEMV | GDX |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 2.1% | 97.4% |
| Information Technology | 29.8% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 4.4% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 15.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 23.2% | 2.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (23% of EEMV, 2% of GDX).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | +1.1% | +16.2% | +20.0% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +5.9% | 2.20% |
| GDX | +18.6% | +4.8% | +56.3% | +47.0% | +23.7% | +12.6% | 0.70% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EEMV vs GDX →
Shared Holdings(4)
The top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by BVN, ZVL and 4FO.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EEMV and GDX overlap?
EEMV and GDX overlap by 0.6% of portfolio weight. They share 4 holdings (EEMV holds 334 positions and GDX holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EEMV and GDX?
The two portfolios are 0.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EEMV and GDX?
The largest positions held by both funds are BVN, ZVL, 4FO and AU. Together the top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EEMV own that GDX doesn't?
330 positions (98.6% of EEMV) are unique to EEMV, led by 000660, 009150 and 2308. In the other direction, 47 positions (91.2% of GDX) are unique to GDX.