EEMV vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap
EEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 334 holdings · $3.5B · as of 2026-05-31
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VanEck · 114 holdings · $7.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EEMV: 2026-05-31, GDXJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EEMV and GDXJ?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV, by iShares) holds 334 positions; VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ, by VanEck) holds 114. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3EEMV holds 334 · GDXJ holds 114
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EEMV 1%·GDXJ 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EEMV
331 of 334 positions (98.7% of the fund) are not held by GDXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EEMV | GDXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 2.1% | 84.2% |
| Information Technology | 29.8% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 4.4% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 15.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 23.2% | 16.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (23% of EEMV, 16% of GDXJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | +1.1% | +16.2% | +20.0% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +5.9% | 2.20% |
| GDXJ | +18.9% | +3.4% | +66.3% | +52.0% | +23.9% | +10.8% | 2.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EEMV vs GDXJ →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by BVN, ZVL and 4FO.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EEMV and GDXJ overlap?
EEMV and GDXJ overlap by 0.6% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (EEMV holds 334 positions and GDXJ holds 114), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EEMV and GDXJ?
The two portfolios are 0.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EEMV and GDXJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are BVN, ZVL and 4FO. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does EEMV own that GDXJ doesn't?
331 positions (98.7% of EEMV) are unique to EEMV, led by 000660, 009150 and 2308. In the other direction, 111 positions (93.9% of GDXJ) are unique to GDXJ.