EEMV vs ICLN: Holdings Overlap
EEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 334 holdings · $3.5B · as of 2026-05-31
ICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EEMV: 2026-05-31, ICLN: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EEMV and ICLN?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV, by iShares) holds 334 positions; iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN, by iShares) holds 123. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14EEMV holds 334 · ICLN holds 123
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EEMV 1%·ICLN 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EEMV
320 of 334 positions (97.9% of the fund) are not held by ICLN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ICLN
109 of 123 positions (87.7% of the fund) are not held by EEMV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EEMV | ICLN |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 2.9% | 32.4% |
| Information Technology | 29.8% | 12.3% |
| Utilities | 2.7% | 19.4% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 16.0% | 1.3% |
| Unclassified | 23.2% | 34.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (23% of EEMV, 34% of ICLN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | +1.1% | +16.2% | +20.0% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +5.9% | 2.20% |
| ICLN | -5.3% | +11.7% | +34.9% | +4.0% | -3.1% | +8.9% | 1.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EEMV vs ICLN →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 600900, EQTL3 and 601012.
0.75% | 5.88% | 0.75% | |
0.16% | 2.88% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 1.10% | 0.15% | |
0.09% | 1.03% | 0.09% | |
0.05% | 0.66% | 0.05% | |
| KOREAN WON | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| NEW TAIWAN DOLLAR | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| CHINESE RENMINBI | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| CHILEAN PESO | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| BRAZIALIAN REAL | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Euro | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| TURKISH LIRA | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| INDONESIAN RUPIAH | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EEMV and ICLN overlap?
EEMV and ICLN overlap by 1.2% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (EEMV holds 334 positions and ICLN holds 123), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EEMV and ICLN?
The two portfolios are 1.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EEMV and ICLN?
The largest positions held by both funds are 600900, EQTL3, 601012, 600905 and 600674. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EEMV own that ICLN doesn't?
320 positions (97.9% of EEMV) are unique to EEMV, led by 000660, 009150 and 2308. In the other direction, 109 positions (87.7% of ICLN) are unique to ICLN.