EEMV vs IGF: Holdings Overlap
EEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 334 holdings · $3.5B · as of 2026-05-31
IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 88 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EEMV: 2026-05-31, IGF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EEMV and IGF?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV, by iShares) holds 334 positions; iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF, by iShares) holds 88. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7EEMV holds 334 · IGF holds 88
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EEMV 1%·IGF 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EEMV
327 of 334 positions (98.0% of the fund) are not held by IGF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EEMV | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 2.7% | 39.3% |
| Information Technology | 29.8% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 2.9% | 20.7% |
| Industrials | 2.9% | 18.2% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 22.3% | 0.1% |
| Unclassified | 23.2% | 21.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (23% of EEMV, 21% of IGF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | +1.1% | +16.2% | +20.0% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +5.9% | 2.20% |
| IGF | -1.8% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +16.5% | +10.6% | +8.0% | 2.93% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EEMV vs IGF →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by JE2, 94C and 135.
0.26% | 0.56% | 0.26% | |
0.47% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.10% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.40% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| KOREAN WON | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Euro | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EEMV and IGF overlap?
EEMV and IGF overlap by 0.6% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (EEMV holds 334 positions and IGF holds 88), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EEMV and IGF?
The two portfolios are 0.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EEMV and IGF?
The largest positions held by both funds are JE2, 94C, 135, HUP1 and HONG KONG DOLLAR. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EEMV own that IGF doesn't?
327 positions (98.0% of EEMV) are unique to EEMV, led by 000660, 009150 and 2308. In the other direction, 81 positions (98.8% of IGF) are unique to IGF.