EEMV vs ILF: Holdings Overlap
EEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 334 holdings · $3.5B · as of 2026-05-31
ILFiShares Latin America 40 ETF
iShares · 44 holdings · $3.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EEMV: 2026-05-31, ILF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EEMV and ILF?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV, by iShares) holds 334 positions; iShares Latin America 40 ETF (ILF, by iShares) holds 44. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11EEMV holds 334 · ILF holds 44
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EEMV 2%·ILF 21%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EEMV
323 of 334 positions (96.8% of the fund) are not held by ILF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ILF
33 of 44 positions (78.1% of the fund) are not held by EEMV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EEMV | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 15.5% | 36.9% |
| Information Technology | 29.8% | 0.0% |
| Materials | 2.1% | 21.4% |
| Energy | 2.9% | 13.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 4.4% | 9.4% |
| Other Sectors | 21.3% | 17.6% |
| Unclassified | 23.2% | 1.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (23% of EEMV, 1% of ILF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | +1.1% | +16.2% | +20.0% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +5.9% | 2.20% |
| ILF | +2.7% | +15.2% | +38.5% | +14.3% | +10.7% | +7.1% | 3.41% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EEMV vs ILF →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by BAP, AMXB and SBSP3.
0.73% | 3.57% | 0.73% | |
0.49% | 3.56% | 0.49% | |
0.47% | 2.23% | 0.47% | |
0.46% | 0.78% | 0.46% | |
0.12% | 0.97% | 0.12% | |
0.09% | 0.39% | 0.09% | |
0.05% | 8.50% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 1.17% | 0.04% | |
| CHILEAN PESO | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.01% |
| BRAZIALIAN REAL | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| MEXICAN NUEVO PESO | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EEMV and ILF overlap?
EEMV and ILF overlap by 2.5% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (EEMV holds 334 positions and ILF holds 44), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EEMV and ILF?
The two portfolios are 2.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EEMV and ILF?
The largest positions held by both funds are BAP, AMXB, SBSP3, FALAB and LTM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EEMV own that ILF doesn't?
323 positions (96.8% of EEMV) are unique to EEMV, led by 000660, 009150 and 2308. In the other direction, 33 positions (78.1% of ILF) are unique to ILF.