EEMV vs LIT: Holdings Overlap
EEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 334 holdings · $3.5B · as of 2026-05-31
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EEMV: 2026-05-31, LIT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EEMV and LIT?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV, by iShares) holds 334 positions; Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41. They have 2 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 2EEMV holds 334 · LIT holds 41
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EEMV 1%·LIT 11%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EEMV
332 of 334 positions (98.5% of the fund) are not held by LIT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in LIT
39 of 41 positions (89.3% of the fund) are not held by EEMV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EEMV | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 2.1% | 41.6% |
| Information Technology | 29.8% | 13.8% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 2.2% | 9.6% |
| Communication Services | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 17.3% | 8.5% |
| Unclassified | 23.2% | 26.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (23% of EEMV, 26% of LIT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | +1.1% | +16.2% | +20.0% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +5.9% | 2.20% |
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EEMV vs LIT →
Shared Holdings(2)
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EEMV and LIT overlap?
EEMV and LIT overlap by 0.8% of portfolio weight. They share 2 holdings (EEMV holds 334 positions and LIT holds 41), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EEMV and LIT?
The two portfolios are 0.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EEMV and LIT?
The largest positions held by both funds are 002371 and 006400. Together the top 2 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does EEMV own that LIT doesn't?
332 positions (98.5% of EEMV) are unique to EEMV, led by 000660, 009150 and 2308. In the other direction, 39 positions (89.3% of LIT) are unique to LIT.