EEMV vs MCHI: Holdings Overlap
EEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 334 holdings · $3.5B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are EEMV and MCHI?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV, by iShares) holds 334 positions; iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580. They have 103 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 103EEMV holds 334 · MCHI holds 580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EEMV 20%·MCHI 36%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EEMV
231 of 334 positions (79.6% of the fund) are not held by MCHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EEMV | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 29.8% | 7.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 2.2% | 21.1% |
| Communication Services | 9.1% | 17.2% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 14.8% |
| Consumer Staples | 4.4% | 1.4% |
| Other Sectors | 15.0% | 8.8% |
| Unclassified | 23.2% | 28.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (23% of EEMV, 29% of MCHI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | +1.1% | +16.2% | +20.0% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +5.9% | 2.20% |
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EEMV vs MCHI →
Shared Holdings(103)
The top 10 shared positions account for 54% of the overlap, led by W8V, ICK and C6T.
1.35% | 1.80% | 1.35% | |
1.17% | 2.10% | 1.17% | |
0.78% | 3.97% | 0.78% | |
0.95% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
0.69% | 0.74% | 0.69% | |
0.47% | 1.12% | 0.47% | |
0.36% | 0.41% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.48% | 0.35% | |
0.37% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.69% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.27% | 0.45% | 0.27% | |
0.41% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.75% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.49% | 0.22% | |
0.37% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.18% | 13.21% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 2.35% | 0.18% | |
0.64% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.47% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.40% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.56% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.21% | 0.13% | |
0.26% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.22% | 0.11% | |
0.22% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EEMV and MCHI overlap?
EEMV and MCHI overlap by 12.1% of portfolio weight. They share 103 holdings (EEMV holds 334 positions and MCHI holds 580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EEMV and MCHI?
The two portfolios are 12.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EEMV and MCHI?
The largest positions held by both funds are W8V, ICK, C6T, EK7 and IKF. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 54% of the total overlap.
What does EEMV own that MCHI doesn't?
231 positions (79.6% of EEMV) are unique to EEMV, led by 000660, 009150 and 2308. In the other direction, 477 positions (64.0% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI.