EWC vs FBCG: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 84 holdings · $6.2B · as of 2026-05-31
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWC: 2026-05-31, FBCG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWC and FBCG?
iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC, by iShares) holds 84 positions; Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214. They have 6 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 6EWC holds 84 · FBCG holds 214
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWC 15%·FBCG 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWC
78 of 84 positions (84.9% of the fund) are not held by FBCG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWC | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 8.2% | 48.3% |
| Financials | 37.4% | 2.1% |
| Communication Services | 0.7% | 17.1% |
| Energy | 17.1% | 0.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.1% | 16.8% |
| Other Sectors | 26.5% | 14.3% |
| Unclassified | 6.9% | 0.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of EWC, 1% of FBCG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWC | +5.0% | +14.2% | +31.3% | +22.9% | +12.6% | +11.6% | 1.22% |
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWC vs FBCG →
Shared Holdings(6)
The top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by CLS, SHOP and SU.
 CLSCelestica, Inc. | 1.45% | 0.88% | 0.88% |
|---|---|---|---|
 SHOPShopify Inc CL A SUB VTG SHS | 4.74% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
 SUSuncor Energy Inc. COM NPV 'NEW' | 2.44% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 AEMAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd. | 3.00% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
 FMFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.71% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
 CPCanadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. | 2.60% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWC and FBCG overlap?
EWC and FBCG overlap by 1.5% of portfolio weight. They share 6 holdings (EWC holds 84 positions and FBCG holds 214), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWC and FBCG?
The two portfolios are 1.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWC and FBCG?
The largest positions held by both funds are CLS, SHOP, SU, AEM and FM. Together the top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWC own that FBCG doesn't?
78 positions (84.9% of EWC) are unique to EWC, led by RY, TD and ENB. In the other direction, 208 positions (98.3% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG.