FBCG vs FNDA: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
FNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Schwab · 930 holdings · $9.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, FNDA: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and FNDA?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA, by Schwab) holds 930. They have 49 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 49FBCG holds 214 · FNDA holds 930
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 11%·FNDA 9%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
165 of 214 positions (88.3% of the fund) are not held by FNDA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | FNDA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 15.0% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 20.0% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 4.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 12.1% |
| Financials | 2.1% | 15.3% |
| Other Sectors | 8.5% | 32.2% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 1% of FNDA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| FNDA | +2.5% | +21.8% | +32.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% | 1.09% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs FNDA →
Shared Holdings(49)
The top 10 shared positions account for 51% of the overlap, led by LITE, COHR and FIX.
0.82% | 0.92% | 0.82% | |
0.45% | 0.54% | 0.45% | |
0.30% | 0.41% | 0.30% | |
0.38% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.30% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.03% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.20% | 0.33% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.23% | 0.20% | |
1.26% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.23% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.27% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.20% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.49% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.67% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.42% | 0.12% | |
0.15% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.16% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.30% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.12% | 0.10% | |
0.16% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.12% | 0.10% | |
0.16% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.27% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.14% | 0.09% | |
0.37% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and FNDA overlap?
FBCG and FNDA overlap by 6.0% of portfolio weight. They share 49 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and FNDA holds 930), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and FNDA?
The two portfolios are 6.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and FNDA?
The largest positions held by both funds are LITE, COHR, FIX, TWLO and UAL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 51% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that FNDA doesn't?
165 positions (88.3% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by NVDA, AAPL and GOOGL. In the other direction, 881 positions (90.6% of FNDA) are unique to FNDA.