FBCG vs IJJ: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
IJJiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
iShares · 301 holdings · $9.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, IJJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and IJJ?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ, by iShares) holds 301. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18FBCG holds 214 · IJJ holds 301
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 2%·IJJ 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
196 of 214 positions (98.2% of the fund) are not held by IJJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | IJJ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 7.0% |
| Financials | 2.1% | 22.4% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 19.0% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 0.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 12.4% |
| Other Sectors | 8.5% | 37.8% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 0% of IJJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| IJJ | +3.0% | +15.1% | +23.8% | +12.8% | +9.2% | +10.5% | 1.56% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs IJJ →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the overlap, led by NXT, RH and PVH.
0.15% | 0.40% | 0.15% | |
0.20% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.20% | 0.13% | |
0.10% | 0.79% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.81% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.35% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.29% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 0.18% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.82% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.30% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.24% | 0.07% | |
0.14% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.43% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.33% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 1.09% | 0.06% | |
0.03% | 0.36% | 0.03% | |
0.00% | 0.35% | 0.00% | |
0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and IJJ overlap?
FBCG and IJJ overlap by 1.4% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and IJJ holds 301), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and IJJ?
The two portfolios are 1.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and IJJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are NXT, RH, PVH, RRX and SNX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that IJJ doesn't?
196 positions (98.2% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by NVDA, AAPL and GOOGL. In the other direction, 283 positions (91.8% of IJJ) are unique to IJJ.