FBCG vs IWO: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
iShares · 1101 holdings · $14.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, IWO: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and IWO?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO, by iShares) holds 1101. They have 27 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 27FBCG holds 214 · IWO holds 1101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 2%·IWO 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
187 of 214 positions (97.6% of the fund) are not held by IWO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWO
1074 of 1101 positions (92.2% of the fund) are not held by FBCG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 19.0% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 23.7% |
| Health Care | 5.5% | 23.1% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 2.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 7.3% |
| Other Sectors | 5.2% | 20.5% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 4.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 4% of IWO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| IWO | +1.2% | +21.0% | +34.7% | +17.5% | +5.9% | +11.0% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs IWO →
Shared Holdings(27)
The top 10 shared positions account for 62% of the overlap, led by EAT, NXT and BE.
0.29% | 0.42% | 0.29% | |
0.15% | 0.94% | 0.15% | |
0.11% | 1.99% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.29% | 0.11% | |
0.09% | 0.15% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.28% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.22% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.77% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 0.14% | 0.08% | |
0.09% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.21% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.19% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.12% | 0.07% | |
0.20% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.36% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.24% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.26% | 0.06% | |
0.05% | 0.17% | 0.05% | |
0.07% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| HeartFlow Inc. COM | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
0.06% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.01% | 0.25% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and IWO overlap?
FBCG and IWO overlap by 1.9% of portfolio weight. They share 27 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and IWO holds 1101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and IWO?
The two portfolios are 1.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and IWO?
The largest positions held by both funds are EAT, NXT, BE, IESC and TVTX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 62% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that IWO doesn't?
187 positions (97.6% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by NVDA, AAPL and GOOGL. In the other direction, 1074 positions (92.2% of IWO) are unique to IWO.