FBCG vs IWP: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, IWP: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and IWP?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277. They have 54 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 54FBCG holds 214 · IWP holds 277
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 10%·IWP 33%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
160 of 214 positions (89.9% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 15.6% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 24.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 21.2% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 4.9% |
| Health Care | 5.5% | 14.9% |
| Other Sectors | 5.2% | 18.9% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 0% of IWP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs IWP →
Shared Holdings(54)
The top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the overlap, led by MPWR, ALAB and CVNA.
1.03% | 1.82% | 1.03% | |
0.54% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.50% | 1.53% | 0.50% | |
0.49% | 0.90% | 0.49% | |
0.36% | 3.32% | 0.36% | |
0.30% | 1.73% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 2.33% | 0.29% | |
0.23% | 0.27% | 0.23% | |
0.23% | 2.49% | 0.23% | |
0.23% | 1.51% | 0.23% | |
0.20% | 0.91% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 0.25% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 1.08% | 0.18% | |
0.16% | 1.26% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.65% | 0.16% | |
0.82% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.16% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 1.16% | 0.12% | |
0.23% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 2.07% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.15% | 0.12% | |
0.38% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.39% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.17% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.21% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and IWP overlap?
FBCG and IWP overlap by 7.7% of portfolio weight. They share 54 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and IWP holds 277), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and IWP?
The two portfolios are 7.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and IWP?
The largest positions held by both funds are MPWR, ALAB, CVNA, FTAI and HWM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that IWP doesn't?
160 positions (89.9% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by NVDA, AAPL and GOOGL. In the other direction, 223 positions (66.9% of IWP) are unique to IWP.