FBCG vs IWS: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
IWSiShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
iShares · 712 holdings · $15.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, IWS: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and IWS?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS, by iShares) holds 712. They have 65 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 65FBCG holds 214 · IWS holds 712
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 10%·IWS 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
149 of 214 positions (89.4% of the fund) are not held by IWS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWS
647 of 712 positions (84.8% of the fund) are not held by FBCG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | IWS |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 12.3% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 3.2% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 17.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 7.8% |
| Financials | 2.1% | 15.1% |
| Other Sectors | 8.5% | 44.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 0% of IWS).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| IWS | +3.3% | +22.1% | +29.8% | +16.6% | +9.8% | +10.4% | 1.27% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs IWS →
Shared Holdings(65)
The top 10 shared positions account for 54% of the overlap, led by WDC, SNDK and LITE.
1.19% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
0.81% | 0.92% | 0.81% | |
0.82% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.45% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.33% | 0.44% | 0.33% | |
0.30% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.22% | 1.08% | 0.22% | |
0.20% | 0.26% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.75% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 0.46% | 0.19% | |
0.23% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.38% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.12% | 0.51% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.15% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.34% | 0.12% | |
0.16% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.18% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.13% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.14% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.13% | 0.10% | |
0.16% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.13% | 0.10% | |
0.08% | 0.36% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.11% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.43% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and IWS overlap?
FBCG and IWS overlap by 7.5% of portfolio weight. They share 65 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and IWS holds 712), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and IWS?
The two portfolios are 7.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and IWS?
The largest positions held by both funds are WDC, SNDK, LITE, COHR and DAL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 54% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that IWS doesn't?
149 positions (89.4% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by NVDA, AAPL and GOOGL. In the other direction, 647 positions (84.8% of IWS) are unique to IWS.