FBCG vs JHMM: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
JHMMJohn Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
John Hancock · 666 holdings · $6.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, JHMM: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and JHMM?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM, by John Hancock) holds 666. They have 77 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 77FBCG holds 214 · JHMM holds 666
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 11%·JHMM 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
137 of 214 positions (88.4% of the fund) are not held by JHMM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | JHMM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 13.9% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 20.0% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 2.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 9.8% |
| Financials | 2.1% | 15.5% |
| Other Sectors | 8.5% | 37.7% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 0% of JHMM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| JHMM | +3.3% | +17.3% | +24.7% | +15.8% | +8.8% | +11.9% | 0.86% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs JHMM →
Shared Holdings(77)
The top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the overlap, led by MPWR, COHR and LITE.
1.03% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.45% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.82% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.30% | 0.50% | 0.30% | |
0.49% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.23% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.38% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.42% | 0.20% | |
0.18% | 0.32% | 0.18% | |
0.16% | 0.33% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.31% | 0.15% | |
0.16% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.30% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.33% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.13% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.49% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.16% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.16% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.27% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.17% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.14% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.16% | 0.10% | |
0.16% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.15% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.33% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and JHMM overlap?
FBCG and JHMM overlap by 7.0% of portfolio weight. They share 77 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and JHMM holds 666), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and JHMM?
The two portfolios are 7.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and JHMM?
The largest positions held by both funds are MPWR, COHR, LITE, FIX and FTAI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that JHMM doesn't?
137 positions (88.4% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by NVDA, AAPL and GOOGL. In the other direction, 589 positions (86.4% of JHMM) are unique to JHMM.