FBCG vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, ONEQ: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and ONEQ?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 100 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 54.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 54.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 100FBCG holds 214 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 77%·ONEQ 67%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
114 of 214 positions (23.2% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 53.0% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 12.5% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 3.1% |
| Health Care | 5.5% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 5.2% | 9.7% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(100)
The top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and AMZN.
14.58% | 11.18% | 11.18% | |
9.61% | 9.98% | 9.61% | |
8.40% | 6.33% | 6.33% | |
5.19% | 7.29% | 5.19% | |
9.08% | 4.83% | 4.83% | |
3.73% | 4.61% | 3.73% | |
3.89% | 3.01% | 3.01% | |
1.45% | 3.56% | 1.45% | |
0.82% | 2.37% | 0.82% | |
2.22% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
0.81% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
1.26% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.19% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
2.03% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.42% | 0.38% | |
0.37% | 0.78% | 0.37% | |
0.68% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.25% | 0.32% | 0.25% | |
0.61% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.21% | 0.86% | 0.21% | |
0.19% | 0.21% | 0.19% | |
0.23% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 1.83% | 0.17% | |
1.03% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.19% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and ONEQ overlap?
FBCG and ONEQ overlap by 54.8% of portfolio weight. They share 100 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 54.8% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, AMZN, MSFT and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that ONEQ doesn't?
114 positions (23.2% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by LLY, TSM and CLS. In the other direction, 922 positions (32.0% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.