FBCG vs QQQM: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Invesco · 101 holdings · $97.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, QQQM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and QQQM?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 42 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 47.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 47.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 42FBCG holds 214 · QQQM holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 71%·QQQM 68%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
172 of 214 positions (28.6% of the fund) are not held by QQQM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 57.8% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 14.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 11.4% |
| Consumer Staples | 1.2% | 6.4% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 3.2% |
| Other Sectors | 9.5% | 6.6% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 0% of QQQM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| QQQM | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.7% | +25.3% | +15.2% | — | 0.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs QQQM →
Shared Holdings(42)
The top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
14.58% | 8.13% | 8.13% | |
9.61% | 7.26% | 7.26% | |
5.19% | 5.30% | 5.19% | |
8.40% | 4.60% | 4.60% | |
9.08% | 3.51% | 3.51% | |
3.73% | 3.36% | 3.36% | |
3.89% | 2.96% | 2.96% | |
2.22% | 1.59% | 1.59% | |
1.45% | 3.45% | 1.45% | |
1.26% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
0.82% | 4.78% | 0.82% | |
0.81% | 1.09% | 0.81% | |
1.19% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
2.03% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
0.68% | 0.73% | 0.68% | |
0.61% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.38% | 0.84% | 0.38% | |
0.37% | 1.57% | 0.37% | |
1.03% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.27% | 0.29% | 0.27% | |
0.82% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.25% | 0.64% | 0.25% | |
0.23% | 0.36% | 0.23% | |
0.21% | 1.74% | 0.21% | |
0.19% | 0.44% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and QQQM overlap?
FBCG and QQQM overlap by 47.5% of portfolio weight. They share 42 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and QQQM holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and QQQM?
The two portfolios are 47.5% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and QQQM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that QQQM doesn't?
172 positions (28.6% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by LLY, TSM and CLS. In the other direction, 59 positions (31.7% of QQQM) are unique to QQQM.