IBB vs XMHQ: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 254 holdings · $9.3B · as of 2026-03-31
XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Invesco · 80 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IBB: 2026-03-31, XMHQ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IBB and XMHQ?
iShares Biotechnology ETF (IBB, by iShares) holds 254 positions; Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ, by Invesco) holds 80. They have 5 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 5IBB holds 254 · XMHQ holds 80
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IBB 7%·XMHQ 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IBB
249 of 254 positions (93.2% of the fund) are not held by XMHQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IBB | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 91.0% | 19.7% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 28.5% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.5% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 8.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 18.8% |
| Unclassified | 8.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (9% of IBB, 0% of XMHQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBB | -0.3% | +17.3% | +51.0% | +16.4% | +3.1% | +7.4% | 0.21% |
| XMHQ | +4.3% | +16.0% | +18.7% | +14.6% | +10.6% | +13.0% | 0.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IBB vs XMHQ →
Shared Holdings(5)
The top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by UTHR, ILMN and MEDP.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IBB and XMHQ overlap?
IBB and XMHQ overlap by 6.7% of portfolio weight. They share 5 holdings (IBB holds 254 positions and XMHQ holds 80), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IBB and XMHQ?
The two portfolios are 6.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IBB and XMHQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are UTHR, ILMN, MEDP, EXEL and HALO. Together the top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does IBB own that XMHQ doesn't?
249 positions (93.2% of IBB) are unique to IBB, led by GILD, AMGN and VRTX. In the other direction, 75 positions (86.8% of XMHQ) are unique to XMHQ.