IEMG vs IXN: Holdings Overlap
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 2697 holdings · $156.6B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 137 holdings · $8.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IEMG: 2026-05-31, IXN: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IEMG and IXN?
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG, by iShares) holds 2697 positions; iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN, by iShares) holds 137. They have 17 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 17IEMG holds 2697 · IXN holds 137
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IEMG 31%·IXN 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IEMG
2680 of 2697 positions (69.2% of the fund) are not held by IXN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IEMG | IXN |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 36.2% | 99.1% |
| Financials | 11.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.0% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 4.6% | 0.6% |
| Materials | 2.9% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 8.4% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 30.7% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (31% of IEMG, 0% of IXN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEMG | +0.3% | +19.9% | +33.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +9.0% | 2.25% |
| IXN | +3.7% | +34.3% | +47.4% | +33.2% | +19.9% | +24.0% | 0.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IEMG vs IXN →
Shared Holdings(17)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660.
12.49% | 4.60% | 4.60% | |
6.80% | 3.39% | 3.39% | |
5.82% | 1.80% | 1.80% | |
1.02% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.42% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.79% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.42% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.74% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.44% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.20% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.35% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| KOREAN WON | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| CANADIAN DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| NEW TAIWAN DOLLAR | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Euro | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| GREAT BRITISH POUND | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IEMG and IXN overlap?
IEMG and IXN overlap by 12.5% of portfolio weight. They share 17 holdings (IEMG holds 2697 positions and IXN holds 137), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IEMG and IXN?
The two portfolios are 12.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IEMG and IXN?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSMWF, 005930, 000660, 2308 and 2454. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does IEMG own that IXN doesn't?
2680 positions (69.2% of IEMG) are unique to IEMG, led by 700, 9988 and C6T. In the other direction, 120 positions (87.3% of IXN) are unique to IXN.