SCHG vs XLK: Holdings Overlap
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab · 193 holdings · $62.4B · as of 2026-05-31
XLKState Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 73 holdings · $122.8B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (SCHG: 2026-05-31, XLK: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SCHG and XLK?
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG, by Schwab) holds 193 positions; State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLK, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 73. They have 30 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 44.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 44.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 30SCHG holds 193 · XLK holds 73
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCHG 44%·XLK 63%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCHG
163 of 193 positions (55.7% of the fund) are not held by XLK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in XLK
43 of 73 positions (36.7% of the fund) are not held by SCHG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SCHG | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 45.9% | 99.9% |
| Communication Services | 15.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 8.4% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 6.8% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 11.2% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | +4.3% | +9.9% | +19.1% | +24.1% | +14.0% | +18.6% | 0.37% |
| XLK | +4.9% | +30.9% | +43.5% | +30.7% | +20.3% | +24.4% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCHG vs XLK →
Shared Holdings(30)
The top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
11.01% | 14.35% | 11.01% | |
9.83% | 12.41% | 9.83% | |
7.17% | 10.04% | 7.17% | |
4.55% | 5.39% | 4.55% | |
2.93% | 4.11% | 2.93% | |
1.25% | 2.36% | 1.25% | |
0.88% | 1.67% | 0.88% | |
0.79% | 1.93% | 0.79% | |
0.64% | 1.39% | 0.64% | |
0.62% | 1.01% | 0.62% | |
0.57% | 1.31% | 0.57% | |
0.45% | 0.80% | 0.45% | |
0.37% | 0.69% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.62% | 0.36% | |
0.32% | 0.59% | 0.32% | |
0.32% | 0.51% | 0.32% | |
0.30% | 0.66% | 0.30% | |
0.28% | 0.50% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 0.44% | 0.27% | |
0.24% | 0.43% | 0.24% | |
0.22% | 0.41% | 0.22% | |
0.17% | 0.34% | 0.17% | |
0.12% | 0.26% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.23% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.16% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCHG and XLK overlap?
SCHG and XLK overlap by 44.2% of portfolio weight. They share 30 holdings (SCHG holds 193 positions and XLK holds 73), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCHG and XLK?
The two portfolios are 44.2% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCHG and XLK?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO and AMD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the total overlap.
What does SCHG own that XLK doesn't?
163 positions (55.7% of SCHG) are unique to SCHG, led by AMZN, GOOGL and TSLA. In the other direction, 43 positions (36.7% of XLK) are unique to XLK.