URA vs NLR: Holdings Overlap
Global X · 52 holdings · $5.9B · as of 2026-04-30
NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
VanEck · 25 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (URA: 2026-04-30, NLR: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are URA and NLR?
Global X Uranium ETF (URA, by Global X) holds 52 positions; VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 48.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 48.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18URA holds 52 · NLR holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- URA 70%·NLR 59%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in URA
34 of 52 positions (29.9% of the fund) are not held by NLR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | URA | NLR |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 56.0% | 43.6% |
| Utilities | 7.3% | 37.9% |
| Industrials | 19.7% | 14.6% |
| Materials | 2.2% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 14.7% | 3.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (15% of URA, 4% of NLR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URA | +7.6% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +31.7% | +23.0% | +16.3% | 4.64% |
| NLR | +6.4% | -5.1% | +1.2% | +27.4% | +20.4% | +12.2% | 2.69% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in URA vs NLR →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the overlap, led by CCJ, NAC Kazatomprom JSC and UEC.
23.13% | 7.97% | 7.97% | |
| NAC Kazatomprom JSC | 4.81% | 4.58% | 4.58% |
5.79% | 4.55% | 4.55% | |
6.27% | 4.37% | 4.37% | |
4.24% | 4.35% | 4.24% | |
7.31% | 3.78% | 3.78% | |
3.09% | 4.24% | 3.09% | |
3.00% | 3.60% | 3.00% | |
2.87% | 4.20% | 2.87% | |
1.99% | 2.84% | 1.99% | |
1.67% | 2.90% | 1.67% | |
1.61% | 3.72% | 1.61% | |
| CGN Mining Co Ltd | 1.11% | 2.85% | 1.11% |
0.98% | 1.30% | 0.98% | |
0.80% | 1.35% | 0.80% | |
| Silex Systems Ltd | 0.77% | 1.39% | 0.77% |
| IsoEnergy Ltd | 0.34% | 0.54% | 0.34% |
0.30% | 0.43% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do URA and NLR overlap?
URA and NLR overlap by 48.0% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (URA holds 52 positions and NLR holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both URA and NLR?
The two portfolios are 48.0% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of URA and NLR?
The largest positions held by both funds are CCJ, NAC Kazatomprom JSC, UEC, NXE and UUUU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the total overlap.
What does URA own that NLR doesn't?
34 positions (29.9% of URA) are unique to URA, led by SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM TR MUTUAL FUND, 047040 and 000720. In the other direction, 7 positions (40.8% of NLR) are unique to NLR.