ACWV vs CIBR: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ACWV: 2026-05-31, CIBR: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWV and CIBR?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42. They have 9 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 9ACWV holds 412 · CIBR holds 42
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 6%·CIBR 38%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
403 of 412 positions (93.6% of the fund) are not held by CIBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | CIBR |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 88.7% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 2.1% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 23.5% | 6.5% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 2.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 2% of CIBR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs CIBR →
Shared Holdings(9)
The top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by CSCO, MSFT and IBM.
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 2.13% | 7.67% | 2.13% |
|---|---|---|---|
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.13% | 1.85% | 1.13% |
 IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. COM | 0.72% | 1.98% | 0.72% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 0.47% | 3.08% | 0.47% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 0.35% | 8.46% | 0.35% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 0.28% | 7.40% | 0.28% |
 ACNAccenture PLC CLS'A'USD0.0000225 | 0.24% | 1.87% | 0.24% |
 CHKPCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd. ORD | 0.21% | 3.18% | 0.21% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 0.17% | 2.27% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and CIBR overlap?
ACWV and CIBR overlap by 5.7% of portfolio weight. They share 9 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and CIBR holds 42), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and CIBR?
The two portfolios are 5.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and CIBR?
The largest positions held by both funds are CSCO, MSFT, IBM, FFIV and PANW. Together the top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that CIBR doesn't?
403 positions (93.6% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by JNJ, TSMWF and DUK. In the other direction, 33 positions (61.7% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR.