ACWV vs EWT: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 86 holdings · $11.1B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are ACWV and EWT?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT, by iShares) holds 86. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21ACWV holds 412 · EWT holds 86
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 5%·EWT 37%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
391 of 412 positions (94.2% of the fund) are not held by EWT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | EWT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 65.0% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 9.5% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 1.9% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.6% | 0.9% |
| Other Sectors | 23.5% | 1.5% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 21.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 21% of EWT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| EWT | +1.2% | +62.3% | +78.6% | +38.5% | +18.6% | +18.8% | 2.73% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs EWT →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 79% of the overlap, led by TSMWF, 2303 and 2412.
1.22% | 19.33% | 1.22% | |
1.08% | 2.25% | 1.08% | |
0.35% | 0.75% | 0.35% | |
0.30% | 0.68% | 0.30% | |
0.22% | 0.53% | 0.22% | |
0.19% | 0.49% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.59% | 0.19% | |
0.17% | 0.48% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.64% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.71% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 1.17% | 0.15% | |
0.13% | 0.64% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.45% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 0.43% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.69% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 5.64% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.39% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.58% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 0.38% | 0.08% | |
| NEW TAIWAN DOLLAR | 0.02% | 0.28% | 0.02% |
0.02% | 0.19% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and EWT overlap?
ACWV and EWT overlap by 5.1% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and EWT holds 86), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and EWT?
The two portfolios are 5.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and EWT?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSMWF, 2303, 2412, 2884 and 2892. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 79% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that EWT doesn't?
391 positions (94.2% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and DUK. In the other direction, 65 positions (62.6% of EWT) are unique to EWT.