CGGO vs FBCG: Holdings Overlap
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Capital Group · 104 holdings · $11.5B · as of 2026-05-31
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGGO: 2026-05-31, FBCG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGO and FBCG?
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO, by Capital Group) holds 104 positions; Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214. They have 33 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 23.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 23.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 33CGGO holds 104 · FBCG holds 214
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGO 45%·FBCG 67%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGO
71 of 104 positions (53.5% of the fund) are not held by FBCG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGO | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.1% | 48.3% |
| Communication Services | 6.7% | 17.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.3% | 16.8% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 6.1% |
| Financials | 10.4% | 2.1% |
| Other Sectors | 17.2% | 8.5% |
| Unclassified | 3.0% | 0.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of CGGO, 1% of FBCG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | -0.2% | +17.3% | +26.5% | +20.0% | — | — | 0.98% |
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGO vs FBCG →
Shared Holdings(33)
The top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the overlap, led by AVGO, GOOGL and MSFT.
3.70% | 3.73% | 3.70% | |
3.02% | 9.08% | 3.02% | |
2.04% | 5.19% | 2.04% | |
1.39% | 14.58% | 1.39% | |
1.37% | 3.89% | 1.37% | |
2.45% | 1.19% | 1.19% | |
6.62% | 1.12% | 1.12% | |
0.89% | 2.25% | 0.89% | |
5.69% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
0.81% | 1.26% | 0.81% | |
0.76% | 0.82% | 0.76% | |
0.75% | 9.61% | 0.75% | |
0.73% | 8.40% | 0.73% | |
0.92% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.38% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
0.51% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.85% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.55% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.61% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.84% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.63% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.88% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.53% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.63% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.74% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGO and FBCG overlap?
CGGO and FBCG overlap by 23.5% of portfolio weight. They share 33 holdings (CGGO holds 104 positions and FBCG holds 214), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGO and FBCG?
The two portfolios are 23.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGO and FBCG?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, GOOGL, MSFT, NVDA and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the total overlap.
What does CGGO own that FBCG doesn't?
71 positions (53.5% of CGGO) are unique to CGGO, led by 000660, 005930 and ASML. In the other direction, 181 positions (32.9% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG.