FBCG vs MGK: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
MGKVanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
Vanguard · 59 holdings · $33.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, MGK: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and MGK?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund (MGK, by Vanguard) holds 59. They have 37 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 60.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 60.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 37FBCG holds 214 · MGK holds 59
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 71%·MGK 85%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
177 of 214 positions (28.4% of the fund) are not held by MGK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | MGK |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 54.4% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 16.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 13.1% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 3.0% |
| Health Care | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| Other Sectors | 5.2% | 7.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 0% of MGK).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| MGK | +3.8% | +10.2% | +19.4% | +24.7% | +14.0% | +18.8% | 0.32% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs MGK →
Shared Holdings(37)
The top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and GOOGL.
14.58% | 13.75% | 13.75% | |
9.61% | 12.60% | 9.61% | |
9.08% | 5.51% | 5.51% | |
5.19% | 9.01% | 5.19% | |
8.40% | 4.59% | 4.59% | |
3.89% | 4.17% | 3.89% | |
3.73% | 4.40% | 3.73% | |
2.25% | 3.17% | 2.25% | |
2.22% | 1.76% | 1.76% | |
1.45% | 4.18% | 1.45% | |
0.82% | 1.14% | 0.82% | |
0.80% | 1.72% | 0.80% | |
0.63% | 0.78% | 0.63% | |
0.81% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
0.58% | 0.74% | 0.58% | |
1.26% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.49% | 1.18% | 0.49% | |
2.03% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.39% | 0.90% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.80% | 0.38% | |
0.37% | 1.42% | 0.37% | |
0.26% | 1.97% | 0.26% | |
0.23% | 0.36% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.44% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.78% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and MGK overlap?
FBCG and MGK overlap by 60.1% of portfolio weight. They share 37 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and MGK holds 59), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and MGK?
The two portfolios are 60.1% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and MGK?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL, MSFT and AMZN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that MGK doesn't?
177 positions (28.4% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by WDC, TSM and MPWR. In the other direction, 22 positions (14.5% of MGK) are unique to MGK.