FBCG vs SCHG: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab · 193 holdings · $62.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, SCHG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and SCHG?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG, by Schwab) holds 193. They have 63 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 56.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 56.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 63FBCG holds 214 · SCHG holds 193
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 72%·SCHG 77%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
151 of 214 positions (27.5% of the fund) are not held by SCHG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 45.9% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 15.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 12.3% |
| Health Care | 5.5% | 8.4% |
| Financials | 2.1% | 6.8% |
| Other Sectors | 9.2% | 11.2% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 0% of SCHG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| SCHG | +4.3% | +9.9% | +19.1% | +24.1% | +14.0% | +18.6% | 0.37% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs SCHG →
Shared Holdings(63)
The top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and AMZN.
14.58% | 11.01% | 11.01% | |
9.61% | 9.83% | 9.61% | |
8.40% | 5.67% | 5.67% | |
5.19% | 7.17% | 5.19% | |
9.08% | 4.75% | 4.75% | |
3.73% | 4.55% | 3.73% | |
3.89% | 3.45% | 3.45% | |
2.25% | 3.05% | 2.25% | |
1.45% | 3.91% | 1.45% | |
2.22% | 1.27% | 1.27% | |
0.82% | 0.91% | 0.82% | |
0.80% | 1.40% | 0.80% | |
1.26% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.39% | 1.18% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 1.25% | 0.37% | |
0.29% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.03% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 1.92% | 0.26% | |
0.45% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.23% | 0.26% | 0.23% | |
0.30% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.21% | 0.51% | 0.21% | |
0.27% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.19% | 0.29% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.32% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and SCHG overlap?
FBCG and SCHG overlap by 56.5% of portfolio weight. They share 63 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and SCHG holds 193), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and SCHG?
The two portfolios are 56.5% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and SCHG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, AMZN, MSFT and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that SCHG doesn't?
151 positions (27.5% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by MRVL, WDC and TSM. In the other direction, 130 positions (22.6% of SCHG) are unique to SCHG.